Proceedings of the World Conference on Earthquake Engineering

Article details


Showing 22034 total records

Sr. No.AuthorTitle
18801Nakamura YutakaReal-time information systems for hazards mitigation [11WCEE]
18802Lee W. H. K., Shing T. C. and Teng T.LDesign and implementation of earthquake early warning systems in Taiwan [11WCEE]
18803Espinosa-Aranda J. M., Jimenez A., Ibarrola G, Alcantara F., AguilarA., Inostroza M. and Maldonado S.Results of the Mexico City early warning system [11WCEE]
18804Ordaz Mario, Perez-Rocha Luis Eduardo and Reinoso EduardoSeismic design criteria: considerations for very soft soils [11WCEE]
18805Park RExplicit incorporation of element and structure overstrength in the design process [11WCEE]
18806Seneviratna G. D. P. K. and Krawinkler H.Modifications of seismic demands for MDOF systems [11WCEE]
18807Miranda E.Site-dependent seismic demands for nonlinear SDOF systems [11WCEE]
18808Fajfar PeterDesign spectra for the new generation of codes [11WCEE]
18809Riddell RUse and knowledge of design spectra [11WCEE]
18810Moehle Jack PDisplacement-based seismic design criteria [11WCEE]
18811Otani S.Recent developments in seismic design criteria in Japan [11WCEE]
18812Pinto Paolo EmilioAssessment and redesign of existing structures current—developments in Europe [11WCEE]
18813Cornell C. AllinCalculating building seismic performance reliability: a basis for multi-level design norms [11WCEE]
18814Hamburger R. 0Implementing performance based seismic design in structural engineering practice [11WCEE]
18815Bertero Vitelmo V.The need for multi-level seismic design criteria [11WCEE]
18816Krawinkler H.Introduction to the special theme session on seismic design criteria [11WCEE]
18817Casciati F. Active control of structures in European seismic areas [11WCEE]
18818Kobori TakujiActive and hybrid structural control research in Japan [11WCEE]
18819Soong T. T.Active control research in the U.S. [11WCEE]
18820Iemura H.Development in passive structural control in Japan [11WCEE]
18821Hanson Robert DDevelopments in structural control in the USA (passive) [11WCEE]
18822Buckle I. GOverview of seismic design methods for bridges in different countries and future directions [11WCEE]
18823Pinto Paolo EmilioEuropean perspectives on seismic design of bridges [11WCEE]
18824Park RNew Zealand perspectives on seismic design of bridges [11WCEE]
18825Iwasaki Toshio Perspectives of seismic design criteria for highway bridges in Japan [11WCEE]
18826Roberts James E. US perspectives on seismic design of bridges [11WCEE]
18827Anagnostopoulos S. Building pounding re-examined: how serious a problem is it? [11WCEE]
18828Jagiasi Anil R. and Kasai Kazuhiko Estimate and control of relative displacement between adjacent structures [11WCEE]
18829Valles-Mattox R. E. and Reinhorn A. M. An energy approach to pounding of structures [11WCEE]
18830Filiatrault A., Wagner P. and Cherry SAn experimental study on the seismic pounding of buildings [11WCEE]
18831Jeng V. and Tzeng W.L.Building seismic separation at Taipei City [11WCEE]
18832Kasai K., JagiasiA. R. andMaison B. F.Survey and analysis of building pounding during 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake [11WCEE]
18833Bertero Vitelmo V.Implications of observed pounding of buildings on seismic code regulations [11WCEE]
18834Kaminosono T.Japanese experience on building rehabilitation: the case of Kobe City [11WCEE]
18835Rojahn Christopher, Shapiro Daniel, Reaveley Lawrence D., Holmes William T., Smith James R. and Morelli UgoU. S. Guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings [11WCEE]
18836Ersoy UgurSeismic rehabilitation—applications, research and current needs [11WCEE]
18837Sauter Franz FDesign philosophy for seismic upgrading of buildings—a Latin American perspective [11WCEE]
18838Martinez-Romero E.Energy dissipation devices and foundation strengthening [11WCEE]
18839de la Torre 0Frame jacketing [11WCEE]
18840Garcia-Jarque F.Experiences in Mexico. Reinforcing and bracing buildings after the 1985 earthquake. A designer's point of view [11WCEE]
18841Rioboo J. MaCable bracing [11WCEE]
18842Iglesias J. and Aguilar J. ARehabilitation of buildings after the 1985 Mexico City earthquake [11WCEE]
18843Jirsa J.0Introductory remarks for special theme session—rehabilitation of buildings [11WCEE]
18844Grunthal G. and Gutierrez C. AEuropean macroseismic scale (EMS-92); innovations especially with respect to engineered buildings and experiences in its worldwide applications [11WCEE]
18845YoussefNabihApplication of hybrid damping system with base isolation for the seismic retrofit of Los Angeles Hall [11WCEE]
18846Penelis G. Gr.Techniques materials for structural restoration [11WCEE]
18847Gavarini C. and Bruno S.Towards a complex approach to preservation and seismic protection of monuments [11WCEE]
18848Meli Roberto and Sanchez-Ramirez RobertoConsiderations on the seismic safety of historical monuments [11WCEE]
18849Giuffre Antonino and Carocci CaterinaVulnerabilty and mitigation in historical centres in seismic areas [11WCEE]
18850Poulos H. G. and Tabesh A.Seismic response of pile foundations—some important factors [11WCEE]
18851Papalou A. and Bielak J.Seismic interaction effects in earth and rockfill dams [11WCEE]
18852Prakash Shamsher and Puri V. K.Analysis and design of foundation under earthquakes [11WCEE]
18853Chao Heng-Yih andBorja Ronaldo I.Local soil condition and nonlinear FE model [11WCEE]
18854Tazoh Takashi and Gazetas GeorgePile foundations subjected to large ground deformations: lessons from Kobe and research needs [11WCEE]
18855Kokusho T., Sato K. andMatsumoto M. Nonlinear dynamic soil properties back-calculated from strong seismic motions during Hyogoken-Nanbu earthquake [11WCEE]
18856lai Susumi, Ichii Koji and Morita ToshikazuLessons learned from the performance of caisson type quay walls at 1995 Great Hanshin earthquake [11WCEE]
18857Sarma S. K. and Chen Y. C.Bearing capacity of strip footings near sloping ground during earthquakes [11WCEE]
18858Paolucci R. and Faccioli E.Seismic behaviour of shallow foundations by simple elasto-plastic models [11WCEE]
18859Pecker ASeismic bearing capacity of shallow foundations [11WCEE]
18860Sieffert J. G.What is missing for using in practice available results on foundation impedances [11WCEE]
18861Carrubba P. and Maugeri M.Non linear effects during dynamic loading on piles [11WCEE]
18862Finn W. D. L, Thavaraj T.andWuGSeismic analysis of pile foundations: state-of-art [11WCEE]
18863Wolf John P. and Song ChongminConsistent infinitesimal finite-element cell method to model unbounded soil—a boundary finite-element procedure [11WCEE]
18864Popovici A. and Sarghiuta R.Comments concerning present regulations on arch dams seismic analysis [11WCEE]
18865Weiland MartinSeismic performance and assessment criteria for concrete dams [11WCEE]
18866LinGaoAseismic design of arch dams [11WCEE]
18867Fenves Gregory L. and Chavez Juan W.Evaluation of earthquake induced sliding in gravity dams [11WCEE]
18868Taylor C. ANon-linear analysis of the seismic behaviour of moderate height concrete gravity dams [11WCEE]
18869Fan B. H. and Sanchez Sanchez H. AIntroduction [11WCEE]
18870Kuroiwa JulioA regional earthquake scenario in southern Peru [11WCEE]
18871Toppozada T. RScenario for a M8+ earthquake in Northwestern California [11WCEE]
18872Guevara L.T.Medical district earthquake planning scenario in Caracas, Venezuela [11WCEE]
18873Fernandez J., Hoefer G., Tucker B., Ventura C. and Villacis C.Using seismic scenarios for urban risk management in developing countries [11WCEE]
18874Wong Felix S. and Tang AlexAssessment of telecommunications damage using scenario earthquakes [11WCEE]
18875Kazuoh SeoApplication of microtremors to earthquake damage scenarios—lessons learned from recent damaging earthquakes [11WCEE]
18876Kaneko Fumio, Segawa Shukyo and Komaru YasushiA simple estimation of strong ground motion distribution for disaster evaluation [11WCEE]
18877Rynn John, Stuart Harold and Pedersen IanEarthquake damage scenarios from 1989 Newcastle earthquake—some practical applications towards future mitigation measures for Australia [11WCEE]
18878Shah Haresh and Dong WeiminScenario earthquakes in financial risk management [11WCEE]
18879SmolkaAThe use of earthquake scenarios in the insurance industry—opportunities for the application of GIS [11WCEE]
18880Kappos A. J. , Stylianidis K. C. and Michailidis C.N.A methodology for developing loss scenarios, with an application to the city of Thessaloniki [11WCEE]
18881Montoya-Dulche C.A comprehensive computer system for seismic risk analysis and assessment using object oriented philosophy [11WCEE]
18882Pinto A, V. and Calvi G.M.Ongoing and future research in support of Eurocode 8 [11WCEE]
18883Gazetas G. and Nikolaou AKinematic bending moments in piles: developments for new-code revisions [11WCEE]
18884Faccioli E., Paolucci R. and Pecker ACode-oriented studies on the behaviour of shallow foundations under seismic loading [11WCEE]
18885Calvi G. M. and Pinto P. E.Assessment of EC8 provisions for reinforced concrete bridges [11WCEE]
18886Fardis M. N., Calvi G. M. and Panagiotakos T. BStudies for the development of code provision for infilled RC frames [11WCEE]
18887Elnashai A. S., Broderick B. M. and Salvitti L. MAssessment of EC8 behaviour factors for RC, steel and composite frames [11WCEE]
18888Carvalho E. C, Coelho Etna and Fardis M. N.Assessment of EC8 provisions for reinforced concrete frames [11WCEE]
18889Taylor C. A. and Crewe A. J.Shaking table tests of simple direct foundations [11WCEE]
18890Bousias S., Franchioni G and Casirati M. Seismic tests with three simultaneous shaking tables on a 1:8 scaled bridge model in support of design Eurocode 8 [11WCEE]
18891Pinto A. V., Verzeletti G, Magonette G, Pegon P., Negro P. and Guedes J.Pseudo-dynamic testing of large-scale R/C bridges in ELSA [11WCEE]
18892Negro P. and Taylor C. AEffect of infills on the global seismic behaviour of R/C frames: results of pseudodynamic and shaking table tests [11WCEE]
18893Carydis P. G., Mouzakis H. P., Vougioukas E. A., Crewe A. J., Taylor C A., Franchioni G. and Bairrao RComparative assessment of shaking tables [11WCEE]
18894Faccioli E. VSite effects in the Eurocodc 8 [11WCEE]
18895Abrahamson N. AEmpirical models of site response effects [11WCEE]
18896ArchuletaR. J., SteidlJ. H. and Tumarkin A. G. Garner Valley downhole array: a case study of site effects [11WCEE]
18897Hisada Y. and Yamamoto S.One-, two-, and three-dimensional site effects in sediment-filled basins [11WCEE]
18898Fah DHybrid methods for simulating site effects [11WCEE]
18899Furumura T.Pseudospectral method for wave propagation simulation [11WCEE]
18900Day Steven M.,Magistrate Harold and McLaughlin Keith LGround motion simulation in 3D using an adaptive grid [11WCEE]