Proceedings of the Tenth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering

Madrid, Spain 1992

Article details


Search in: Tenth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering | Showing 1196 results for: Conference: 10WCEE

Sr. No.AuthorTitle
201W.JalilNew French seismic code orientations [10WCEE]
202A.A.Nassar, H.Krawinkler & J.D.OsteraasSeismic design based on strength and ductility demands [10WCEE]
203R.Y.Tand Y.T.ChaoConstruction of a design response spectrum from evolutionary spectra of seismogram [10WCEE]
204R.Radicchia, A.D'Ambrisi & M.MezziNon linear responses of simulated accelerograms [10WCEE]
205H.Krawinkler & M.RahnamaEffects of soft soils on design spectra [10WCEE]
206E. Miranda Nonlinear response spectra for earthquake resistant design [10WCEE]
207A.De Luca & G.SerinoEvaluation of displacement design spectra for base isolated systems [10WCEE]
208A. M.Chandler, G. L. Hutchinson & J. L.WilsonThe use of interplate derived spectra in intraplate seismic regions [10WCEE]
209M.D.TrifunacShould peak accelerations be used to scale design spectrum amplitudes? [10WCEE]
210R.Cuvillo, C.Huerta, J. J. Lopez Cela & E.AlarcónRecommendations on seismic actions on bridges [10WCEE]
211J.Llorca, C.Huerta,J.J.Lopez-Cela, E.Laso & EAlarcónRecommendations on seismic actions on port structures [10WCEE]
212M.ChavezSeismic hazard and structural safety in Mexico City [10WCEE]
213J.Schwarz & G.Grünthal Harmonization of codes with respect to seismic hazard and seismic action for structures of different risk potential [10WCEE]
214R.MeliCode-prescribed seismic actions and performance of buildings [10WCEE]
215J.Grases, G.Cascante & E.GajardoEarthquake hazard mapping for seismic design codes: A new approach [10WCEE]
216M N. Fardis & S. N. EconomouVariable safety factors for seismic design of RC [10WCEE]
217M.E Paté-CornellSeismic hazard uncertainties in rational building code decisions [10WCEE]
218A.M.Jablonski, K.T.Law, D.T.Lau & J.-R.PierreThe collapse of the Struve Slough Bridge during the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake in different seismic code perspectives [10WCEE]
219A.Rutenberg, A.Benbenishti & O.A.PekauNonlinear seismic behaviour of code-designed eccentric systems [10WCEE]
220P.R.Bose, R.Dubey & M.AYazdiComparison of codal provisions suggested by various countries [10WCEE]
221P.A. Hidalgo, A.Arias & E.F.CruzA comparison of analysis provisions in seismic codes [10WCEE]
222R.K.Goel &. A.K.ChopraEvaluation of seismic code provisions for asymmetric-plan systems [10WCEE]
223S.Hosni & A.C.HeidebrechtBase shear provisions for soil-structure systems [10WCEE]
224A.Nisar, S. D.Werner & J.L. BeckAssessment of UBC seismic design provisions using recorded building motions [10WCEE]
225S.B.Aladro, C.A.Monguilner & J.Herrera CanoAnalysis of damages and its relations with seismic intensity [10WCEE]
226A.V. Pinto, P. Negro & P. M Jones Comparative analysis of R/C building structures (frame and shear wall) designed according toEC8 [10WCEE]
227Y.K.Wen, D.A.Foutch, D. Eliopoulos & C.-Y.YuEvaluation of seismic reliability of steel buildings designed according to current code procedures [10WCEE]
228N.Shinsuke &. K.YoshikazuUS-Japan Cooperative Research Program (Phase 4): Research project activity of precast seismic structural system (PRESSS) from Japan side [10WCEE]
229M.Inukai, Y.Miura, Y.Yasuda, T.Kaminosono & S.NakataExperimental study on seismic performance of precast reinforced-concrete shear walls [10WCEE]
230A.G.Ayala, O.García &J.A.EscobarEvaluation of seismic design criteria for asymmetric buildings [10WCEE]
231K.A.Hamdy, W.K.Tso & A.GhobarahSeismic design of R/C frames - A Canadian code perspective [10WCEE]
232C.A.Zeris, T.P.Tassios, Y.Lu & G.F.ZhangInfluence of irregularity on the q factor of RC frames [10WCEE]
233J. H. Cassis & RBonelliLessons learned from the March 3, 1985 Chile earthquake and related research [10WCEE]
234K.M.Houghton & S.L.McCabeAssessment of earthquake forces in low-rise structures from lateral and torsional coupling [10WCEE]
235G.Sara' & R.NudoMeaning and evolution of building codes: Eurocode 8 and reinforced concrete constructions in seismic zones [10WCEE]
236L.Crainic, C.Dalban, T.Postelnicu, H.Sandi & T.TereteanA new approach of the Romanian seismic code for buildings [10WCEE]
237J. Eibl & E. KeintzelProposal for harmonized rules for the determination of seismic input data according to Eurocode 8 [10WCEE]
238A.C.Heidebrecht & N.NaumoskiA new foundation factor for the Canadian code [10WCEE]
239W.Lobo-QuinteroFundamentals of the seismic design code of bridges in Venezuela [10WCEE]
240D.Lungu, T.Cornea & S.DemetriuFrequency bandwidth of Vrancea earthquakes and the 1991 edition of seismic Code of Romania [10WCEE]
241E. E. KhachianOn the draft of antiseismic construction standards in the Republic of Armenia [10WCEE]
242S.Otani, T.Okada, T.Kubo & S.NomuraOutline of AIJ design guidelines for RC buildings [10WCEE]
243O.Joh, Y.Goto & T.ShibataAIJ seismic design guidelines for RC buildings-Design of beam-column joints [10WCEE]
244R.E.Torres-Cabrejos & C.E.Huaman-EgoavilEvaluation of seismic risk on water supply pipelines [10WCEE]
245H.O.Soliman & T.K.DattaAnalysis of piping systems for non-stationary support excitation [10WCEE]
246H. KawakamiEarthquake physical damage and serviceability of lifeline networks [10WCEE]
247T.Sato & K.Toki Seismic reliability analyses of large scale lifeline networks taking into account the failure probability of the components [10WCEE]
248A.H.-S.Ang, I.Yoshida, J. Fires, R.Villaverde, R.Schinzinger & I.KatayamaSeismic probabilistic reliability assessment of electric power transmission systems [10WCEE]
249T.Iwamoto, H.Inada & Y.NemotoObservation on behaviors of buried pipelines and ground strain during earthquakes [10WCEE]
250T.Takatani, S.Takada, T.Fuke & S.FukuiAn estimating method of predicted seismic ground motions and an arrangement of remote monitoring seismographs for early detection of earthquake-damages [10WCEE]
251H.Ando, S.Sato & N.TakagiSeismic observation of a pipeline buried at the heterogenous ground [10WCEE]
252H.Nakane, E.Kodama & l.YokoiNew earthquake-induced ground motion severity sensing apparatus for reliable system shutdown [10WCEE]
253S. EshghiBehavior of lifeline systems during Manjil-Iran earthquake of June 20, 1990 [10WCEE]
254S.Komaki, H.Tanshou & H. EgamiDynamic behaviors of an earthquake-damaged viaduct before and after being mended [10WCEE]
255N.Nojima & H.KamedaOptimal strategy by use of tree structure for post-earthquake restoration of lifeline network systems [10WCEE]
256H.Kano, Y.Uragami & T.Iwata Restoration work control system for earthquake damaged city gas pipelines [10WCEE]
257L.R.LWang & H.ZhangBuried pipeline system in a liquefaction environment [10WCEE]
258W.S.Tseng & M.S.YangSeismic performance investigation of a section of Bay Area Rapid Transit elevated structure during the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake [10WCEE]
259C.A. Villacís & T. KatayamaAnalysis of seismic ground and pipe strains observed in Chiba, Japan [10WCEE]
260K.Sekiguchi & H.OishiExperimental study on underground pipeline stabilizing techniques and their effectiveness during liquefaction [10WCEE]
261K.Yagi, T.Hashizume, S.Mataki & N.SuzukiEarthquake damage analysis to telecommunication conduit in liquefied area [10WCEE]
262L. Cret & T. KatayamaOn-line damage estimation for lifeline systems during earthquakes [10WCEE]
263G.S.PereselenkovThe problem of transportation system reliable operation in seismic regions [10WCEE]
264S.Takada & S.HigashiSeismic response analysis for jointed buried pipeline by using shell FEM model [10WCEE]
265R.H.ZhangLifeline interaction and post-earthquake urban system reconstruction [10WCEE]
266M.Ciampoli, R.Giannini & T.PagnoniLifeline interaction and post-earthquake urban system reconstruction [10WCEE]
267A.ZervaDevelopment of differential response spectra from spatial variability models [10WCEE]
268R.Dubey & N.C Singhal Seismic analysis and design consideration of an aqueduct on alluvial soil [10WCEE]
269P.Banerji & A.GhoshEarthquake response analysis of above-ground pipelines [10WCEE]
270F.Miura,T.D.O'Rourke & M.HamadaInterpretation of high pressure pipeline damage by liquefaction-induced ground movements [10WCEE]
271E.A.Vougioukas & P.G.CarydisPerformance of buried pipelines, subjected to fault movement [10WCEE]
272T.Koike, T.Imai & T.KanekoLarge deformation analysis of buried pipelines [10WCEE]
273Y.-A. He & J.-W. Liang3-D responses of buried pipeline systems under earthquake wave propagation [10WCEE]
274M. Hakuno & T. YamamotoSimulation of effect of large movement of ground on underground pipe [10WCEE]
275H.Watanabe & T.SuehiroExperimental and numerical studies on dynamic earth pressure acting on side walls of underground conduit [10WCEE]
276T.Ariman & B.J.LeeTension/bending behaviour of buried pipelines subject to fault movements in earthquakes [10WCEE]
277T.Akiyoshi, K.Fuchida, S.Shirinashihama & T.TsutsumiStiffening effect of anti-liquefaction techniques for buried pipes [10WCEE]
278M.O'Rourke & C.Nordberg Behavior of buried pipelines subject to permanent ground deformation [10WCEE]
279D.R.Bonneville & D.W.CockeObserved effectiveness of minimal seismic strengthening of unreinforced masonry buildings [10WCEE]
280D.C.BreiholzCenter Core seismic hazard reduction system for URM buildings [10WCEE]
281N.G.Maldonado & L.A.OlivenciaTechniques used to repair seismic-resistant masonry walls [10WCEE]
282T.Sano, G.Di Pasquale, G.Manieri & R.SacchettiCriteria of seismic strengthening of equipment of a hospital in Italy [10WCEE]
283R.Reitherman Nonstructural approaches developed after the Loma Prieta earthquake [10WCEE]
284H.YuThe design inquiry of liquefaction prevention of foundation using macadam wells of pressure-release and water-removal [10WCEE]
285F.M.Lavelle & R.H. SuesSeismic pounding retrofits for closely spaced buildings [10WCEE]
286G. Bureau & P.KokkasSeismic retrofit of liquid storage tanks [10WCEE]
287R.Antonucci & R.Giacchetti Experimental analysis of a discountinuous wall-to-floor connection [10WCEE]
288R.Sparacio, F.Cavuoto, I.Vanzi & G.ZampinoRetrofit through base-isolation: S. Pietro-Frigento [10WCEE]
289C.D.Poland & E.M.Reis The repair and strengthening of the historic Stanford Memorial Church [10WCEE]
290S.TobrinerThe performance of San Francisco's earthquake-resistant city halls: The old city hall in the earthquake of 1906 and the new city hall in the earthquake of 1989 [10WCEE]
291D.AnicicTen years of cultural monuments rehabilitation in Dubrovnik [10WCEE]
292S.D.Nour, M.Bărhuţă & A.MihulThe analysis of the behaviour of some historical consolidated buildings made of brick masonry to repeated earthquakes [10WCEE]
293M.Tomaževič, T.Velechovsky & P.WeissThe effect of interventions in the floor structural system on the seismic resistance of historic stone-masonry buildings: An experimental study [10WCEE]
294E.Scire, V.DeNicola, M.Candela, G.Urciuoli, F.Rozza & E.DelGuercioControl works on the tottering walls of the northern side of Calitri castle, Southern Italy [10WCEE]
295R.Ballardini & C.GavariniSeismic protection of monumental buildings in Italy [10WCEE]
296A.Corsanego & S.D'AgostinoGuidelines for decisions concerning monuments in Italy [10WCEE]
297D.Pezzullo, F.Cavuoto, M.De Cunzo, M.Del Giudice & R.SparacioSeismic retrofit of historical buildings [10WCEE]
298P.VelkovModelling of repair and retrofit of historical buildings in the Balkan region [10WCEE]
299C.R.Thewalt & B.I.StojadinovićBehavior and retrofit of bridge outrigger beams [10WCEE]
300M.J.N.Priestley,F.Seible & Y.H.CliaiSeismic retrofit of bridge columns using steel jackets [10WCEE]