201 | W.Jalil | New French seismic code orientations [10WCEE] |
202 | A.A.Nassar, H.Krawinkler & J.D.Osteraas | Seismic design based on strength and ductility demands [10WCEE] |
203 | R.Y.Tand Y.T.Chao | Construction of a design response spectrum from evolutionary spectra of seismogram [10WCEE] |
204 | R.Radicchia, A.D'Ambrisi & M.Mezzi | Non linear responses of simulated accelerograms [10WCEE] |
205 | H.Krawinkler & M.Rahnama | Effects of soft soils on design spectra [10WCEE] |
206 | E. Miranda | Nonlinear response spectra for earthquake resistant design [10WCEE] |
207 | A.De Luca & G.Serino | Evaluation of displacement design spectra for base isolated systems [10WCEE] |
208 | A. M.Chandler, G. L. Hutchinson & J. L.Wilson | The use of interplate derived spectra in intraplate seismic regions [10WCEE] |
209 | M.D.Trifunac | Should peak accelerations be used to scale design spectrum amplitudes? [10WCEE] |
210 | R.Cuvillo, C.Huerta, J. J. Lopez Cela & E.Alarcón | Recommendations on seismic actions on bridges [10WCEE] |
211 | J.Llorca, C.Huerta,J.J.Lopez-Cela, E.Laso & EAlarcón | Recommendations on seismic actions on port structures [10WCEE] |
212 | M.Chavez | Seismic hazard and structural safety in Mexico City [10WCEE] |
213 | J.Schwarz & G.Grünthal | Harmonization of codes with respect to seismic hazard and seismic action for structures of different risk potential [10WCEE] |
214 | R.Meli | Code-prescribed seismic actions and performance of buildings [10WCEE] |
215 | J.Grases, G.Cascante & E.Gajardo | Earthquake hazard mapping for seismic design codes: A new approach [10WCEE] |
216 | M N. Fardis & S. N. Economou | Variable safety factors for seismic design of RC [10WCEE] |
217 | M.E Paté-Cornell | Seismic hazard uncertainties in rational building code decisions [10WCEE] |
218 | A.M.Jablonski, K.T.Law, D.T.Lau & J.-R.Pierre | The collapse of the Struve Slough Bridge during the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake in different seismic code perspectives [10WCEE] |
219 | A.Rutenberg, A.Benbenishti & O.A.Pekau | Nonlinear seismic behaviour of code-designed eccentric systems [10WCEE] |
220 | P.R.Bose, R.Dubey & M.AYazdi | Comparison of codal provisions suggested by various countries [10WCEE] |
221 | P.A. Hidalgo, A.Arias & E.F.Cruz | A comparison of analysis provisions in seismic codes [10WCEE] |
222 | R.K.Goel &. A.K.Chopra | Evaluation of seismic code provisions for asymmetric-plan systems [10WCEE] |
223 | S.Hosni & A.C.Heidebrecht | Base shear provisions for soil-structure systems [10WCEE] |
224 | A.Nisar, S. D.Werner & J.L. Beck | Assessment of UBC seismic design provisions using recorded building motions [10WCEE] |
225 | S.B.Aladro, C.A.Monguilner & J.Herrera Cano | Analysis of damages and its relations with seismic intensity [10WCEE] |
226 | A.V. Pinto, P. Negro & P. M Jones | Comparative analysis of R/C building structures (frame and shear wall) designed according toEC8 [10WCEE] |
227 | Y.K.Wen, D.A.Foutch, D. Eliopoulos & C.-Y.Yu | Evaluation of seismic reliability of steel buildings designed according to current code procedures [10WCEE] |
228 | N.Shinsuke &. K.Yoshikazu | US-Japan Cooperative Research Program (Phase 4): Research project activity of precast seismic structural system (PRESSS) from Japan side [10WCEE] |
229 | M.Inukai, Y.Miura, Y.Yasuda, T.Kaminosono & S.Nakata | Experimental study on seismic performance of precast reinforced-concrete shear walls [10WCEE] |
230 | A.G.Ayala, O.García &J.A.Escobar | Evaluation of seismic design criteria for asymmetric buildings [10WCEE] |
231 | K.A.Hamdy, W.K.Tso & A.Ghobarah | Seismic design of R/C frames - A Canadian code perspective [10WCEE] |
232 | C.A.Zeris, T.P.Tassios, Y.Lu & G.F.Zhang | Influence of irregularity on the q factor of RC frames [10WCEE] |
233 | J. H. Cassis & RBonelli | Lessons learned from the March 3, 1985 Chile earthquake and related research [10WCEE] |
234 | K.M.Houghton & S.L.McCabe | Assessment of earthquake forces in low-rise structures from lateral and torsional coupling [10WCEE] |
235 | G.Sara' & R.Nudo | Meaning and evolution of building codes: Eurocode 8 and reinforced concrete constructions in seismic zones [10WCEE] |
236 | L.Crainic, C.Dalban, T.Postelnicu, H.Sandi & T.Teretean | A new approach of the Romanian seismic code for buildings [10WCEE] |
237 | J. Eibl & E. Keintzel | Proposal for harmonized rules for the determination of seismic input data according to Eurocode 8 [10WCEE] |
238 | A.C.Heidebrecht & N.Naumoski | A new foundation factor for the Canadian code [10WCEE] |
239 | W.Lobo-Quintero | Fundamentals of the seismic design code of bridges in Venezuela [10WCEE] |
240 | D.Lungu, T.Cornea & S.Demetriu | Frequency bandwidth of Vrancea earthquakes and the 1991 edition of seismic Code of Romania [10WCEE] |
241 | E. E. Khachian | On the draft of antiseismic construction standards in the Republic of Armenia [10WCEE] |
242 | S.Otani, T.Okada, T.Kubo & S.Nomura | Outline of AIJ design guidelines for RC buildings [10WCEE] |
243 | O.Joh, Y.Goto & T.Shibata | AIJ seismic design guidelines for RC buildings-Design of beam-column joints [10WCEE] |
244 | R.E.Torres-Cabrejos & C.E.Huaman-Egoavil | Evaluation of seismic risk on water supply pipelines [10WCEE] |
245 | H.O.Soliman & T.K.Datta | Analysis of piping systems for non-stationary support excitation [10WCEE] |
246 | H. Kawakami | Earthquake physical damage and serviceability of lifeline networks [10WCEE] |
247 | T.Sato & K.Toki | Seismic reliability analyses of large scale lifeline networks taking into account the failure probability of the components [10WCEE] |
248 | A.H.-S.Ang, I.Yoshida, J. Fires, R.Villaverde, R.Schinzinger & I.Katayama | Seismic probabilistic reliability assessment of electric power transmission systems [10WCEE] |
249 | T.Iwamoto, H.Inada & Y.Nemoto | Observation on behaviors of buried pipelines and ground strain during earthquakes [10WCEE] |
250 | T.Takatani, S.Takada, T.Fuke & S.Fukui | An estimating method of predicted seismic ground motions and an arrangement of remote monitoring seismographs for early detection of earthquake-damages [10WCEE] |
251 | H.Ando, S.Sato & N.Takagi | Seismic observation of a pipeline buried at the heterogenous ground [10WCEE] |
252 | H.Nakane, E.Kodama & l.Yokoi | New earthquake-induced ground motion severity sensing apparatus for reliable system shutdown [10WCEE] |
253 | S. Eshghi | Behavior of lifeline systems during Manjil-Iran earthquake of June 20, 1990 [10WCEE] |
254 | S.Komaki, H.Tanshou & H. Egami | Dynamic behaviors of an earthquake-damaged viaduct before and after being mended [10WCEE] |
255 | N.Nojima & H.Kameda | Optimal strategy by use of tree structure for post-earthquake restoration of lifeline network systems [10WCEE] |
256 | H.Kano, Y.Uragami & T.Iwata | Restoration work control system for earthquake damaged city gas pipelines [10WCEE] |
257 | L.R.LWang & H.Zhang | Buried pipeline system in a liquefaction environment [10WCEE] |
258 | W.S.Tseng & M.S.Yang | Seismic performance investigation of a section of Bay Area Rapid Transit elevated structure during the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake [10WCEE] |
259 | C.A. Villacís & T. Katayama | Analysis of seismic ground and pipe strains observed in Chiba, Japan [10WCEE] |
260 | K.Sekiguchi & H.Oishi | Experimental study on underground pipeline stabilizing techniques and their effectiveness during liquefaction [10WCEE] |
261 | K.Yagi, T.Hashizume, S.Mataki & N.Suzuki | Earthquake damage analysis to telecommunication conduit in liquefied area [10WCEE] |
262 | L. Cret & T. Katayama | On-line damage estimation for lifeline systems during earthquakes [10WCEE] |
263 | G.S.Pereselenkov | The problem of transportation system reliable operation in seismic regions [10WCEE] |
264 | S.Takada & S.Higashi | Seismic response analysis for jointed buried pipeline by using shell FEM model [10WCEE] |
265 | R.H.Zhang | Lifeline interaction and post-earthquake urban system reconstruction [10WCEE] |
266 | M.Ciampoli, R.Giannini & T.Pagnoni | Lifeline interaction and post-earthquake urban system reconstruction [10WCEE] |
267 | A.Zerva | Development of differential response spectra from spatial variability models [10WCEE] |
268 | R.Dubey & N.C Singhal | Seismic analysis and design consideration of an aqueduct on alluvial soil [10WCEE] |
269 | P.Banerji & A.Ghosh | Earthquake response analysis of above-ground pipelines [10WCEE] |
270 | F.Miura,T.D.O'Rourke & M.Hamada | Interpretation of high pressure pipeline damage by liquefaction-induced ground movements [10WCEE] |
271 | E.A.Vougioukas & P.G.Carydis | Performance of buried pipelines, subjected to fault movement [10WCEE] |
272 | T.Koike, T.Imai & T.Kaneko | Large deformation analysis of buried pipelines [10WCEE] |
273 | Y.-A. He & J.-W. Liang | 3-D responses of buried pipeline systems under earthquake wave propagation [10WCEE] |
274 | M. Hakuno & T. Yamamoto | Simulation of effect of large movement of ground on underground pipe [10WCEE] |
275 | H.Watanabe & T.Suehiro | Experimental and numerical studies on dynamic earth pressure acting on side walls of underground conduit [10WCEE] |
276 | T.Ariman & B.J.Lee | Tension/bending behaviour of buried pipelines subject to fault movements in earthquakes [10WCEE] |
277 | T.Akiyoshi, K.Fuchida, S.Shirinashihama & T.Tsutsumi | Stiffening effect of anti-liquefaction techniques for buried pipes [10WCEE] |
278 | M.O'Rourke & C.Nordberg | Behavior of buried pipelines subject to permanent ground deformation [10WCEE] |
279 | D.R.Bonneville & D.W.Cocke | Observed effectiveness of minimal seismic strengthening of unreinforced masonry buildings [10WCEE] |
280 | D.C.Breiholz | Center Core seismic hazard reduction system for URM buildings [10WCEE] |
281 | N.G.Maldonado & L.A.Olivencia | Techniques used to repair seismic-resistant masonry walls [10WCEE] |
282 | T.Sano, G.Di Pasquale, G.Manieri & R.Sacchetti | Criteria of seismic strengthening of equipment of a hospital in Italy [10WCEE] |
283 | R.Reitherman | Nonstructural approaches developed after the Loma Prieta earthquake [10WCEE] |
284 | H.Yu | The design inquiry of liquefaction prevention of foundation using macadam wells of pressure-release and water-removal [10WCEE] |
285 | F.M.Lavelle & R.H. Sues | Seismic pounding retrofits for closely spaced buildings [10WCEE] |
286 | G. Bureau & P.Kokkas | Seismic retrofit of liquid storage tanks [10WCEE] |
287 | R.Antonucci & R.Giacchetti | Experimental analysis of a discountinuous wall-to-floor connection [10WCEE] |
288 | R.Sparacio, F.Cavuoto, I.Vanzi & G.Zampino | Retrofit through base-isolation: S. Pietro-Frigento [10WCEE] |
289 | C.D.Poland & E.M.Reis | The repair and strengthening of the historic Stanford Memorial Church [10WCEE] |
290 | S.Tobriner | The performance of San Francisco's earthquake-resistant city halls: The old city hall in the earthquake of 1906 and the new city hall in the earthquake of 1989 [10WCEE] |
291 | D.Anicic | Ten years of cultural monuments rehabilitation in Dubrovnik [10WCEE] |
292 | S.D.Nour, M.Bărhuţă & A.Mihul | The analysis of the behaviour of some historical consolidated buildings made of brick masonry to repeated earthquakes [10WCEE] |
293 | M.Tomaževič, T.Velechovsky & P.Weiss | The effect of interventions in the floor structural system on the seismic resistance of historic stone-masonry buildings: An experimental study [10WCEE] |
294 | E.Scire, V.DeNicola, M.Candela, G.Urciuoli, F.Rozza & E.DelGuercio | Control works on the tottering walls of the northern side of Calitri castle, Southern Italy [10WCEE] |
295 | R.Ballardini & C.Gavarini | Seismic protection of monumental buildings in Italy [10WCEE] |
296 | A.Corsanego & S.D'Agostino | Guidelines for decisions concerning monuments in Italy [10WCEE] |
297 | D.Pezzullo, F.Cavuoto, M.De Cunzo, M.Del Giudice & R.Sparacio | Seismic retrofit of historical buildings [10WCEE] |
298 | P.Velkov | Modelling of repair and retrofit of historical buildings in the Balkan region [10WCEE] |
299 | C.R.Thewalt & B.I.Stojadinović | Behavior and retrofit of bridge outrigger beams [10WCEE] |
300 | M.J.N.Priestley,F.Seible & Y.H.Cliai | Seismic retrofit of bridge columns using steel jackets [10WCEE] |